Welcome to ecofuture.net

Online community for the eco-conscious

Here is a place to together envision a sustainable future and discuss how we can work towards getting there.

Join us!

Become a member and join the conversation.

Member Login

Lost your password?

Registration is closed

Sorry, you are not allowed to register by yourself on this site!

You must either be invited by one of our team member or request an invitation by email at info {at} yoursite {dot} com.

Note: If you are the admin and want to display the register form here, log in to your dashboard, and go to Settings > General and click "Anyone can register".

Developments in Solar Power Towers

September 21st, 2009 by Alice Maria Tiriac

On August 5th, the company eSolar opened the Sierra Sun Tower, the newest example solar power towers. According to the website of esolar, the Sierra facility supplies 5 MW of clean, renewable energy to the grid. As the only commercial CSP tower in the United States, supplies electricity to Southern California Edison (SCE) and will power up to 4,000 homes. Many bloggers and journalists welcome it as a promising development.

Sierra Sun Tower in Southern California

UBS Wealth Management, moreover, is predicting that the relatively small market for concentrated solar power tends to expand, with projected growth of almost 20 gigawatts in new capacity over the next decade.  UBS analysts Gianrento Gamboni and Christoph Hugi, refers to the new projects in the United States and Spain as they say “After a long period of stagnation, the market is evolving more dynamically.”

  • What is a solar power tower?

One square kilometer of land holds the capacity – depending on the specifities of location – to  generate as much as 100 gigawatt hours (GWh) of electricity per year through solar thermal technology. To make it clear, this amount is enough to run 50,000 residences.

One option to produce this energy is the solar power tower, which is a type of solar thermal plant that uses a tower to receive the sunlight, focused  upon it via an array of flat, movable mirrors (ie. heliostats). These focused rays heats the water and the steam produced powers a turbine. As you see, no pollutants are emitted in producing the electricity.

Today liquid sodium is commonly used instead of water to store the energy during brief interruptions in sunlight or in night time.

  • A major advantage: Solar thermal plants produce electricity whose current and future costs are known.

It is a fixed-cost generation resource know to the consumer in advance and it decreases consumers’ exposure to market fluctuations and the volatile cost of natural gas (which solar thermal typically replaces in the portfolio).

  • A major disadvantage: Solar thermal power plants are huge

It uses a huge land desirably less than 3 percent slope. With respect to the electricity output versus total size, they make use of the land more effectively than coal plants or hydroelectric dams, though.

The best locations for solar power plants are massive lands, such as deserts, for which there might be few other uses; but again, then comes the problem of how to provide the necessary water.

The factsheet in the released in the webpage of governement of CA, claims that as experience is gained with this technology, the acreage requirements
will likely be reduced due to more efficient placement of the heliostats.

  • Five Earlier Examples:
  1. Solar One, a pilot solar-thermal project built in the Mojave Desert (CA, USA) was the first test of a large-scale thermal solar power tower plant. It was designed by the Department of Energy (DOE), Southern California Edison, LA Dept of Water and Power, and California Energy Commission. Solar One’s method of collecting energy was based on producing heat to drive a steam turbine.
  2. Later, in 1995 it was converted into Solar Two, with the addition of a second ring of 108 larger heliostats around the existing Solar One. The total number of heliostats became 1926 on an area of 82,750 m². Solar Two used molten salt, which is a combination of 60% sodium nitrate and 40% potassium nitrate, instead of water.
  3. Solar Tres, which is located in the city of Écija, in Andalusia, Spain and received a subsidy of five million Euro from the European Commission, follows the Solar Two in using molten salt but is designed to be three times of it in size.
  4. Europe’s first commercial solar tower PS10 is located near the Southern Spanish city of Seville. It produces electricity of 11 MW with 624 large heliostats with surfaces of 120 square meters each.  The height the tower is 115 meters.
  5. The PS20 solar power tower is also near Seville. The capacity is 20 megawatt.  The  tower is taller than PS10, it is 160 meters.
  6. The THEMIS solar power tower, located near the village of Targassonne, in the département of Pyrénées-Orientales, South of France, is a R&D center focused on solar energy, as well as a photovoltaic power facility and a solar thermal energy plant. It had a power output of 2 MW in 1983.

Dress Up your Building with Inflatable Solar Panels

September 6th, 2009 by Alice Maria Tiriac

Green design is the new hype. Most of the new buildings are designed with a ecological approach. Greening the existing buildings is much harder, but obligatory. Designers over at Studio Formwork have tried to do just that with a new product design known as Solar Skin.

solar-skin-studio-formwork-1
The Solar Skin is a lightweight  system of inflatable solar components that can be zipped together to form a temporary skin for existing buildings. With this innovative solution, currently inefficient buildings can generate solar energy.

solar-skin-studio-formwork-2

VIA: ECOFRIEND.ORG

Bacterial Approach to Solar Energy

August 15th, 2009 by Alice Maria Tiriac

As the demand for solar power is growing all around the world, scientists develop new technologies for cheaper and more efficient solar energy production. The Hydrogen Club at Oregon University is currently focused mainly on three approaches to solar energy production, namely: bacterial approach, chemical approach (ie. heating up to 1000 degrees to produce hydrogen from water) and the method using microbes to break down waste molecules in water and produce hydrogen as well as a stream of clean water.

Among all, the bacterial method sounds the most appealing to me as it is 100% natural and more promising to be affordable by a larger segment of the world’s population.

The name the protogonists is “cyanobacteria”. Cyanobacteria have an elaborate and highly organized system of internal membranes that function in photosynthesis. And, as a part of this photosynthesis cyanobacteria produce hydrogen. Moreover, it doesn’t need direct or high levels of sunlight.

It incorporates the use of either organic or sulfur compounds as electron donors in photosystem. Unlike in the case of plant photosynthesis, cyclic photophosphorylation takes place in bacterial photosynthesis, i.e. electrons are repeatedly excited in a cyclic manner, with ATP being generated in each cycle. Photosynthetic bacteria are also capable of reducing electron carriers such as NAD, via a linear reaction similar to the electron transmission which occurs during plant photosynthesis. (from Energy conversion by photosynthetic organisms)

Thus, The Hydrogen Club members envision bacteria based solar panels (such as large sheets of gel) to be hung all sides  of buildings as a future solar power generation system which could work even on cloudy days.

However, certain health risks are indicated for mass-reproduction of cyanobacteria, and an accurate assessment of the risks is not available. Certain cyanobacteria produce cyanotoxins including anatoxin-a, anatoxin-as, aplysiatoxin, cylindrospermopsin, domoic acid, microcystin LR, nodularin R (from Nodularia), or saxitoxin. Sometimes a mass-reproduction of cyanobacteria results in algal blooms. (For more information you may read the article “Cyanobacteria, their toxins and health risks”)

The demand for energy is projected to increase by 50% in 20 years. There is no way to meet this need by nuclear or fossil sources, while an hour of sunshine provides the power earth need for one whole year. Different geographies necessitate different technologies and energy tools. One of them could be the .

Photovoltaic tiles?

August 9th, 2009 by Alice Maria Tiriac

While googling for solar panel technology, Solé, a photovoltaic tile developed by SRS Energy, caught my attention for its lightweight, recyclable material and above all, ofcourse, its aesthetic looks.

It’s said elsewhere that, “although its noncrystalline silicone cells gather less energy than conventional tilt-up panels with stiff crystalline cells, they react to a broader spectrum of light even on foggy, cloudy days. (…) It is designed to last at least 20 years as an active solar-power gatherer, but undisturbed, this bumper-tough plastic roof tile could continue to ward water off for a century.”

However, in the blog The Truth about ECD? it is indicated that  the pictures given in the company’s page are actually altered pictured of plain roof tiles (which the company apparently don’t hide). The author of this blog also states the following arguments
1. It is not proven that solar tiles perform better than regular solar panels in foggy, cloudy days.
2. The durability claims are false.
3. The “energy generated per square” claim is false.
4. The claim that “Solé’s thin films will not degrade as fast as other solar cells” is not true.
5. These solar tiles are NOT eligible for state incentive

Other than these, they can only be installed by select US Tile Solé certified contractors, which could be a drawback for some.

Xcel Energy’s proposed solar-power fee is dropped…

August 5th, 2009 by Alice Maria Tiriac

Last week a reader of Solar Power left a comment to one of my posts about the monthly fee Xcel Energy would charge from solar panel customers:

” (…) But, we have bad news for Denver. The new fee proposed by Xcel Energy would punish new customers for getting solar panels.

It’s a monthly fee, which would pay for distribution and transmission of energy,planned to go into effect in April 2010 and would have to be paid to Xcel, regardless of whether the solar customer used any electricity that month. Customers who got solar panels before April 2010 would not have to pay the fee.”

Apparently, they have backed off at the public calling; the mentioned fee will not be charged from the existing users and will be started to be collected from those who install the panels by April 2010.

Here is an excerpt from the article I read:

Bowing to public pressure, Xcel Energy Inc. on Tuesday backed off, for now, its proposal to institute a minimum monthly fee for customers who get most — or all — their electricity from solar power panels perched on the roof of their home or business.

The new charge wouldn’t have affected any current customers using self-generated solar power, only those who installed solar panels after April 2010. The proposal was part of Xcel’s rate case, a series of proposals for pricing electricity, filed with the Colorado Public Utilities Commission in May.

But the idea of charging solar customers a monthly minimum — to cover the cost of connecting the solar panels to the grid — drew a storm of protest from the Denver-area solar power installation businesses, their customers and supporters including the Governor’s Energy Office (GEO). (http://www.bizjournals.com/denver/stories/2009/08/03/daily31.html)

The Futurist anticipates decreasing costs for solar power

July 31st, 2009 by Alice Maria Tiriac

Most people consider shifting their energy consumption to clean solar power, but are relunctant due to the consideration for high costs.

In the website “solar power – green power” some tips are given to lower down the costs:

“Deals on solar panels can be found on many Internet sites, including ecobusinesslinks.com, wholesalesolar.com, and Solartron Technologies.  If you are wary of the cost of a full solar panel set, you may want to consider a mini solar panel set that you can purchase for a DIY home improvement project.  Instead of spending thousands of dollars, you can install mini sets for a few hundred dollars. ”

Moreover, the real cost of solar panels is showing a tendency towards decline. Raymond Kurzweil at the Fortune Brainstorm: TECH conference in Pasadena, California, said that the investments and technological advances decrease and will go on decreasing that cost of solar power systems. As a side effect he adds, “ it’s environmentally much friendlier.”

Elsewhere he gives more detail on this trend:

We are awash in energy (10,000 times more than required to meet all our needs falls on Earth) but we are not very good at capturing it. That will change with the full nanotechnology-based assembly of macro objects at the nano scale, controlled by massively parallel information processes, which will be feasible within twenty years. Even though our energy needs are projected to triple within that time, we’ll capture that .0003 of the sunlight needed to meet our energy needs with no use of fossil fuels, using extremely inexpensive, highly efficient, lightweight, nano-engineered solar panels, and we’ll store the energy in highly distributed (and therefore safe) nanotechnology-based fuel cells. Solar power is now providing 1 part in 1,000 of our needs, but that percentage is doubling every two years, which means multiplying by 1,000 in twenty years.

Raymond Kurzweil (born February 12, 1948) is an inventor and futurist, author of several books on health, artificial intelligence (AI), transhumanism, the technological singularity, and futurism.

Solar biofuel

July 31st, 2009 by Alice Maria Tiriac

Around the world, companies have been finding a growing variety of ways to meet the world’s energy needs with sunlight. The trend has also allowed more uses than ever for solar energy. In this respect, Joule Biotechnologies, Massachusetts company,  developed a new technology:  solar fuel, which is actually a biofuel created from microorganisms using sunlight and carbon dioxide.

Joule’s chief executive Bill Sims says “We’re not a biofuel company, because biofuels are biomass-derived; our technology leverages a highly synthetic organism to create transportation fuels and chemicals. We don’t have an intermediary that has to be grown or transported, it’s a direct-to-product process,”

Studylite – Rechargeable

July 31st, 2009 by Alice Maria Tiriac

With this study light your child will not lose time to do his homework in times of cuts. Plus, no ultra-violet or infra-red radiation. No heat radiation.
Perfect luminosity and ideal illumination. Soothing light eliminates eye strain. Up to 6 hour back-up with mains and solar charging port.

They look practical… I didn’t like the design, though.

http://studylite.in

Need for incentives?

July 26th, 2009 by Alice Maria Tiriac

As we all know, China is investing heavily in renewable energy as early as 2005 (http://www.worldwatch.org/node/41). In the past two weeks Suntech, says Jeff Wolfe, Co-Founder and CEO of groSolar in his article “What we can Learn from China’s Heavy Investment in Solar Energy”, currently the largest solar module manufacturer in the world, signed 2 GW (2000 MW) of projects in China (contracts of a single company versus the total US market amounting to 0.35 GW).

Common sense would tell that China’s cheap labor accounts for the huge difference. Yet, Wolfe cautions; China is actually devoting a lot of money and energy in R&D as well as raising government subsidies and incentives for PV Companies.

Moreover, the strong loans for PV companies are valid for foreign investments as well, thus he says “So the real irony is that I am going to China not just to find products, but to find financing (preliminarily offered) to install those products in the US.”

Maybe all economies need more of a government intervention to boost the demand for the solar energy.

Lowering Tax Bills by using Efficient Energy Resources

July 5th, 2009 by Alice Maria Tiriac

Inventing in alternative sources of energy for our homes helps saving money. It is a fact. Yet, these rare practises still needs to be registered to create public consciousness. Today I read an article at Parkersburg News and Sentinel on the US tax relief to encourage solar energy:

According to the news, The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 extends, expands, and simplifies federal income tax credits for homeowners who make energy efficiency home improvements. The law extends consumer tax benefits through 2010; triples the total available tax credit from $500 to $1,500, and increases the tax credit to 30 percent of the cost of each qualified energy efficiency improvement. It also removes the cap on geothermal heat pumps and solar water heaters through 2016.

Consumers who purchase and install specific products, such as energy-efficient windows, insulation, doors, roofs, and heating and cooling equipment in existing homes can receive a tax credit for 30 percent of the cost, up to $1,500, for improvements placed in service starting Jan. 1, 2009, through Dec. 31, 2010.

Consumers who install solar energy systems (including solar water heating and solar electric systems), small wind systems, geothermal heat pumps, and residential fuel cell and microturbine systems can receive a 30 percent tax credit for systems placed in service before Dec. 31, 2016.

If a person is building a new home, according to the Department of Energy, they can qualify for the tax credit for geothermal heat pumps, photovoltaics, solar water heaters, small wind energy systems and fuel cells.

More information is available on the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act including specific projects and equipment it covers, go to the Alliance for Energy’s Web site at: ase.org/.